# Simulating Data using a Discrete-Time Approach

#### Robin Denz

# Introduction

In this small vignette, we introduce the `sim_discrete_time()` function, which can be used to generate arbitrarily complex longitudinal data with discrete points in time. Just as the `sim_from_dag()` function contained in this package, it allows any mixture of continuous, binary, categorical, count, or time-to-event data. The main advantage of the `sim_discrete_time()` function is that it naturally generates longitudinal data without the need to define a node for each variable at each point in time. It also makes the generation of complex time-to-event data a lot easier. Features such as time-dependent effects, time-dependent covariates, any form of censoring, recurrent-events and competing events may be included in a straightforward fashion (Denz and Timmesfeld 2025).

# What is Discrete-Time Simulation and Why Use it?

A discrete-time simulation (DTS) consists of two steps. First, a bunch of entities (usually but not necessarily people) are created. Afterwards, the change of the states of these entities over time is simulated by increasing the simulation time iteratively in discrete steps, updating the states at each step (Tang et al. 2020). For example, suppose that the entities are people and that we are interested in the states `age` and `death`. Every time the simulation time increases, the `age` of each person increases with it, raising the probability of death. At every step we check if each person is still alive. If they die, the state of `death` changes from 0 to 1. If everyone is dead, we stop the simulation. The schematic flow of DTS is shown in the figure below.

A generalized flow-chart of the discrete-time simulation approach

The `sim_discrete_time()` directly implements this workflow. A data set at \(t = 0\) is either simulated using the `sim_from_dag()` function or supplied directly by the user (using the `t0_data` argument). This data set is then updated according to the time-dependent nodes added to the `dag` using `node_td()` calls. Below we give a short example on how this works in practice. A more realistic (and therefore more complex) example can be found in a different vignette.

A DTS can be seen as a special case of simulation modeling. It is closely related to dynamic microsimulation (Spooner et al. 2021), discrete-event simulation (Banks 2014) and agent-based modeling (Ugur & Saka 2006). As such, it requires a lot of input from the users. In general, the `sim_discrete_time()` function is not an “off-the-shelves” function which can be used “as-is” to simulate data. In most cases, the user needs to write their own functions to actually use this function effectively. This is the price one has to pay for the nearly unlimited flexibility of this simulation methodology. Nevertheless, it may be the only valid simulation strategy when the user is interested in highly complex longitudinal time-to-event data.

# Defining the DAG

Similar to the `sim_from_dag()` function, the user needs to specify the nodes of the underlying causal DAG to use this function. All variables in a DTS can be categorized into three categories: t0_root nodes, t0_child_nodes and tx_nodes.

- t0_root_nodes: Variables that are completely independent of all other variables and are only generated once are called t0_root_nodes. This could be something like sex or geographic entities. They are generally simply sampled from some previously defined distribution, but they could also be sampled directly from existing data. The prefix t0_ indicates that these variables are created only once in the beginning.

- t0_child_nodes: Much like t0_root_nodes, the t0_child_nodes are also variables that are generated only once in the beginning of the discrete-time simulation. The only difference is, that these variables are not simply sampled from a defined distribution. Instead they causally depend in some way on other variables. Those other variables can be root nodes or other child nodes, as long as the underlying causal structure can be described as a directed acyclic graph.

- tx_nodes: This type of node is more complex and is the reason to use DTS. Variables in this category are updated at each step in time of the simulation process. These updates can be fairly easy, such as increasing the age of a person by one time unit on each step, or they can be very complex. For example, if we want to model the occurrence of some kind of time-dependent-event, we can generate the probability of that occurrence at each step depending on other variables in the simulation model or past states of the variable itself.

The `t0_root_nodes` and `t0_child_nodes` arguments are specified using a `DAG` object and calls to the `node()` function as usual when using the `sim_from_dag()` function. In fact, they are simply passed to it under the hood. Their role in the data generation process is only to obtain the initial data set we need for \(t = 0\). It would be equivalent to call the `sim_from_dag()` function manually and then pass the output to the `t0_data` argument. We therefore won’t go into more detail here. More information about how to correctly specify this DAG can be found in the documentation of the `sim_from_dag()` and `node()` functions or the associated vignette.

# A Simple Example - One Terminal Event

Let us consider a very simple example first. Suppose we want to generate data according to the following causal DAG:

A small DAG with time-varying age

Here, \(A\), which stands for `sex`, is a time-invariant variable, whereas \(B\) (`age`) and \(D\) (`death`) are not. Suppose that each tick of the simulation corresponds to a duration of one year. Then, naturally, people will age one year on every simulation tick. We assume that `sex` and `age` have a direct causal effect on the probability of death, regardless of the time. Once people are dead, they stay dead (no reincarnation allowed).

If we want to use this structure in the `sim_discrete_time()` function, we first have to generate an initial dataset for the state of the population at \(t = 0\) as described above. We do this by first specifying the `t0_root_nodes` as follows:

    library(data.table)
    library(ggplot2)
    library(simDAG)

    dag <- empty_dag() +
      node("age", type="rnorm", mean=30, sd=5) +
      node("sex", type="rbernoulli", p=0.5)

We assume that `age` is normally distributed and that we have equal numbers of each `sex`. This information is enough to specify the data set at \(t = 0\). Now we only need to add additional time-dependent nodes using the `node_td()` function and we are ready. First, we define a function that increases the age of all individuals by 1 at each step:

    node_advance_age <- function(data) {
      return(data$age + 1)
    }

Next, we need to define a function that will return the probability of `death` for every individual at time \(t\), given their current `age` and their `sex`. We use a logistic regression model, but make it explicit for exemplary reasons:

    prob_death <- function(data) {
      score <- -10 + 0.15 * data$age + 0.25 * data$sex
      prob <- 1/(1 + exp(-score))
      return(prob)
    }

Now we can add those nodes to the `DAG` as follows:

    dag <- dag +
      node_td("age", type="advance_age", parents="age") +
      node_td("death", type="time_to_event", parents=c("age", "sex"),
              prob_fun=prob_death, event_duration=Inf, save_past_events=TRUE,
              check_inputs=FALSE)

We simply pass the `node_advance_age()` function to the `type` argument of the `age` node. `death` is a time-to-event node, because it’s an event which is generated from a probability at each step in time. That probability, as defined here, is determined by the `prob_death` function we defined earlier. We set `event_duration` to `Inf` to make this a permanent event (once you are dead, there is no going back).

To visualize the resulting DAG, we can use the associated `plot()` method:

    plot(dag)

To finally generate the desired data, we simply call the `sim_discrete_time()` function:

    set.seed(43)
    sim_dat <- sim_discrete_time(n_sim=10, dag=dag, max_t=50, check_inputs=FALSE)

By setting `max_t=50`, we are letting this simulation run for 50 (simulated) years. The results look like this:

    head(sim_dat$data)
    #>         age    sex death_event death_time   .id
    #>       <num> <lgcl>      <lgcl>      <int> <int>
    #> 1: 79.81243   TRUE        TRUE         27     1
    #> 2: 72.12698   TRUE        TRUE         13     2
    #> 3: 77.57016  FALSE        TRUE         31     3
    #> 4: 82.32593  FALSE        TRUE         16     4
    #> 5: 75.47951  FALSE        TRUE         17     5
    #> 6: 78.61284  FALSE        TRUE          9     6

It is easy to see that all people died over the course of those 50 years by looking at the `death_event` column. The `death_time` column records the time at which each person died.

If we want to graphically display a flow diagram of the data-generation mechanism, we may use the `plot()` method associated with the output of the `sim_discrete_time()` function like this:

    plot(sim_dat)

This particular example could be simulated in a much easier fashion, without relying on a discrete-time approach, because `age` increases linearly and the model for `death` is exactly the same regardless of time. DTS is more useful when truly complex data structures are required. Below we will extend this simple example a little bit, but we will still keep it relatively simple.

# Extending the Simple Example - Recurrent Events

Suppose that the event of interest wasn’t `death`, but a cardiovascular event (`cve`). For the case of simplicity we will assume that the same causal structure and causal coefficients from above still apply, but that the event is now no longer terminal and may re-occur an arbitrary number of times. First, let’s redefine the nodes to get the new name right:

    dag <- empty_dag() +
      node("age", type="rnorm", mean=30, sd=5) +
      node("sex", type="rbernoulli", p=0.5)

We also redefine the function that generates the required event probabilities:

    prob_cve <- function(data) {
      score <- -15 + 0.15 * data$age + 0.25 * data$sex
      prob <- 1/(1 + exp(-score))
      return(prob)
    }

Now, all we have to do in this case is change some arguments of the `node_time_to_event()` function:

    dag <- dag +
      node_td("age", type="advance_age", parents=c("age")) +
      node_td("cve", type="time_to_event", parents=c("age", "sex"),
              prob_fun=prob_cve, event_duration=1, save_past_events=TRUE)

Apart from changing the node name, we also changed the `event_duration` parameter to 1, meaning that a cardiovascular event only lasts 1 year. We also set `save_past_events` to `TRUE` in order to store the possible recurrent events. Now we call the `sim_discrete_time()` function as before:

    sim_dat <- sim_discrete_time(n_sim=10, dag=dag, max_t=50)
    head(sim_dat$data)
    #>         age    sex cve_event cve_time   .id
    #>       <num> <lgcl>    <lgcl>    <int> <int>
    #> 1: 82.67833   TRUE     FALSE       NA     1
    #> 2: 90.30020  FALSE      TRUE       50     2
    #> 3: 88.25512   TRUE     FALSE       NA     3
    #> 4: 90.28344  FALSE     FALSE       NA     4
    #> 5: 79.90450   TRUE     FALSE       NA     5
    #> 6: 81.70720   TRUE     FALSE       NA     6

In this case, the data is a little more complex. At time \(t = 50\), only one person is currently experiencing a cardiovascular event, which is why the `cve_event` column is `FALSE` in almost all rows and the `cve_time` column is `NA` in almost all rows. We need to transform this output data into different formats using the `sim2data()` function to gain more information.

For example, we can transform it into the start-stop format:

    d_start_stop <- sim2data(sim_dat, to="start_stop")
    head(d_start_stop)
    #>      .id start  stop    cve      age    sex
    #>    <int> <int> <num> <lgcl>    <num> <lgcl>
    #> 1:     1     1    50  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 2:     2     1    43  FALSE 90.30020  FALSE
    #> 3:     2    44    44   TRUE 90.30020  FALSE
    #> 4:     2    45    49  FALSE 90.30020  FALSE
    #> 5:     2    50    50   TRUE 90.30020  FALSE
    #> 6:     3     1    50  FALSE 88.25512   TRUE

In this format, we can clearly see when the events occurred. This type of format is usually used to fit statistical models for time-to-event data (although before fitting those, you might want to take a look at the `target_event`, `overlap` and `keep_only_first` arguments of `sim2data()`). Another possibility is to transform it into the long-format:

    d_long <- sim2data(sim_dat, to="long")
    head(d_long)
    #> Key: <.id, .time>
    #>      .id .time    cve      age    sex
    #>    <int> <int> <lgcl>    <num> <lgcl>
    #> 1:     1     1  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 2:     1     2  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 3:     1     3  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 4:     1     4  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 5:     1     5  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE
    #> 6:     1     6  FALSE 82.67833   TRUE

This may also be useful to fit discrete-time survival models.

The simulation done here assumes that the time and number of previous events has no effect on any further events of the patient. This assumption may be relaxed by explicitly formulating the `prob_cve` function in a way that it uses the `cve_time` column to change the probability of further events. A more in-depth example that includes considerations like these can be found in the third vignette of this package.

# References

Denz, Robin and Nina Timmesfeld (2025). Simulating Complex Crossectional and Longitudinal Data using the simDAG R Package. arXiv preprint, doi: 10.48550/arXiv.2506.01498.

Banks, Jerry, John S. Carson II, Barry L. Nelson, and David M. Nicol (2014). Discrete-Event System Simulation. Vol. 5. Edinburgh Gate: Pearson Education Limited.

Bilge, Ugur and Osman Saka (2006). “Agent Based Simulations in Healthcare”. In: Ubiquity: Technologies for Better Health in Aging Societies - Proceedings of MIE2006. Ed. by Arie Hassman, Reinhold Haux, Johan van der Lei, Etienne De Clercq, and Francis H. Roger France. IOS Press.

Spooner, Fiona, Jesse F. Abrams, Karyn Morrissey, Gavin Shaddick, Michael Batty, Richard Milton, Adam Dennett, Nik Lomax, Nick Malleson, Natalie Nelissen, Alex Coleman, Jamil Nur, Ying Jin, Rory Greig, Charlie Shenton, and Mark Birkin (2021). “A Dynamic Microsimulation Model for Epidemics”. In: Social Science & Medicine 291.114461.

Tang, Jiangjun, George Leu, und Hussein A. Abbass. 2020. Simulation and Computational Red Teaming for Problem Solving. Hoboken: IEEE Press.